You shipped it in a weekend.
Let's see if you're findable on
Crawld reads your site the way search engines and AI answer engines do, runs 129 checks across SEO and GEO, and tells you exactly what's broken and what to fix first. No SEO background needed.
No card. Score in about a minute. Free account for the findings.
Illustrative example, not a real customer's score. Yours is computed the same way, from what was actually crawled. Clicks and citations come from inside the product; the free scan below returns the score, the findings and the coverage.
A demonstration of one real scan, replayed. Press the button and this panel fills with yours.
An example, not your site. Scan yours and this fills with what was actually measured.
Audit the site. Write the fix. Measure again.
Five stages, and two of them stop and wait for you. The engine can plan and write without pausing; it does not, because an unsupervised agent editing a live site is a different product with a different risk profile.
- 01
Measure
The crawler reads your pages the way search and answer engines do, then runs all 129 checks. Pass, fail, or unmeasured, never rounded up.
- 02
Audit
Every failing check becomes a finding on the page it was found on, with its evidence and how it was decided.
- 03Your call
Plan
Findings ranked by severity times pages affected. Nothing is written until you review the plan, or the part of it you want.
- 04
Fix
Only the items you kept are worked, and each check declares who may fix it: the engine, the engine with your call, or you alone.
- 05Your call
Deliver
The changes arrive written out in full. You mark the fixes ready, then you apply them. Nothing reaches your site except by your hand.
Then it scans again. A fix that did not move its check from fail to pass gets flagged, not forgotten. The long version →
The report you get
Every number on this page came from a crawl.
A real scan. 217 of 218 pages read. The one it couldn't read is marked, not guessed.
THE LINK MAP
See which pages nothing points to.
Crawld maps every internal link on your site and lays it out by click depth from the homepage. Pages that nothing links to float free at the edge: orphans. Engines rarely find them, and you would never notice them in a list.
Orphan pages
Live, published, and unreachable by any internal path.
Click depth
How many hops from your homepage. Anything past three is hard for engines to justify crawling.
Template links
Toggle off nav and footer links to see the structure you actually wrote, not the one your theme repeats on every page.
Most audits hand you a list of URLs. The map shows you the shape of the problem: usually one buried section, not forty unrelated pages.
Your next customers are already asking.
Somewhere else.
Crawld watches Reddit for your keywords, classifies every mention, and drafts a reply grounded in your own site copy. It never posts: you copy the draft, edit it into your own words, and post it yourself.
An illustrative example, not a live feed. Your own Hunt view fills with mentions of your own keywords.
Their thread
"does anyone know a tool that checks if ChatGPT even knows my site exists"
↳ Your reply, drafted
If we couldn't check it, it doesn't pass.
Before the report can tell you what to fix, the score has to be worth trusting. Every one of the 129 checks lands in one of three states, and the third is the reason to believe the other two.
Actually checked, actually clean. The rule ran, the page passed it. Nothing implied.
Actually checked, needs work. Goes straight to the fix queue, ranked by how many pages it affects.
The crawler didn't reach it, or the check couldn't run. Most tools quietly round this up to "pass." We don't. It's gray on the grid and it's gray in the score.
Ranking #1 doesn't matter if the answer doesn't mention you.
16 of the 129 checks exist because people are asking AI instead of clicking blue links. Crawld checks whether your pages are structured the way answer engines actually lift content: schema, extractable claims, source clarity, E-E-A-T signals, tested across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot and Bing.
Example, hand-logged. Citation tracking is in private beta: you log the prompts you want to win and record which engine cites you. Automatic capture is coming; we would rather tell you that than show you a number we made up.
ChatGPT
The largest AI answer engine by users. Tracks whether ChatGPT's browsing and search cite your pages, not just the competitor who out-ranked you on Google.
Claude
Anthropic's own model, increasingly used for research and shopping. Checks whether your content is structured the way Claude's search actually reads it.
Gemini
Built into Search, Workspace, and Android. Tracks whether Gemini's answers reference you when it actually matters, not just that you rank.
Perplexity
Built to cite its sources by design, which means it either credits you or it credits someone else. Tracks your citation share directly.
Google AI Overviews
Sits above the normal results now, and pulls from a narrower slice of the page than classic ranking does. The technical checks are tuned to what it actually lifts.
Copilot
Built into Windows, Edge, and Bing. Same rubric, same fix queue, no separate setup.
Bing
Still the index behind Copilot and half the AI crawlers on the web. The classic search checks cover it. Indexed here means visible in far more places than bing.com.
DeepSeek
The fastest-growing open-weight model, already embedded in apps you've never heard of. Same rubric, same tracking, whichever wrapper someone's asking it through.
Crawled, indexed, cited: three different things.
Indexing tools are genuinely good at the first two steps. They also stop there. Crawld is built around the third.
CRAWLED
A bot fetched your page. Necessary, not sufficient. A crawl proves the page loads, not that anyone will ever surface it.
INDEXED
The engine stored your page and can show it. A whole category of tools exists to get you here fast, and this is where they stop.
CITED
An AI answer actually names you as its source. Indexing doesn't measure this, and doesn't guarantee it. Crawld tracks it per engine and writes the fix for whatever is blocking it.
Every fix is written out for your platform, ready to apply, and the live API automates the scanning. CMS connectors are in progress. See how the loop works →
Five stages. Two places it stops and asks you.
The scan found the problems; the loop turns them into fixes. It ranks the findings, writes the changes, shows its working, and stops for you twice, before anything is written and before anything is handed to you.
Every finding comes with the fix, written out.
You don't need to know what a canonical tag is. The queue shows the exact change, what it replaces, and why. You decide whether to paste it.
The audit finds the gap. The editor fills it.
Some findings are not a tag, they are the page itself: a query nothing on your site answers, or two posts splitting one. The audit surfaces both; the editor drafts against the gaps and checks every draft against what you have already published, because the thing most likely to outrank your new post is your old one. See Write →
This is where Crawld starts.
| Tool | Crawld | Them |
|---|---|---|
| Surfer | Full-site technical + GEO audit | On-page content scoring only |
| SEOTesting | Fix → verify → re-measure loop | Reporting on GSC data |
| IndexRusher | Checks what is blocking citation, not just indexing | Stops at indexed |
| MarketMuse / Clearscope | Site-wide audit + overlap detection | Content briefs only |
| Semrush | Honest unmeasured scoring, GEO checks | Rank tracking |
We publish what isn't built.
Every tool's marketing page is a list of what it does. This is the other list, and it is the reason to believe the first one.
- No pull requests. Crawld has no repo access and pushes nothing.
- No CMS writes. Nothing is applied to your site except by your hand.
- Nothing is build-verified, because nothing is built for you. Every fix is advisory.
- No white-label reports yet.
- AI-citation capture is manual. You log what each engine answered; we track it.
- Reddit Radar cannot post. There is no login, comment, vote or message code in it.
- One past bug where a score was fabricated, and the fix, written up in full.
Every one of these is on the ledger, with the date it changes. Read /transparency →
Free to see the problem.
Paid to fix it.
The diagnosis is free because a score you cannot verify is worthless to both of us. Starter is a cleanup: subscribe, fix the site, cancel. Pro is for sites that keep publishing.
Compare all tiers5 sites, manual citation tracking across 8 engines. More sites on request. White-label reports are coming.
Talk to usNo card for Free · Cancel anytime · The fixes you applied stay in your site
One month covers most cleanups. Cancel anytime; the fixes you applied stay in your site.
Start fixing- Full site crawled on demand
- Every finding, with evidence
- Every fix written out in full
- Re-measured after you apply it
- Ranked plan and fix queue
- Reddit Radar, with drafted replies
- Scan API
For sites that keep publishing: the full 129-check rubric, plus citation tracking across 8 AI engines.
Start Pro- Everything in Starter
- 129 checks across 8 categories
- The editor, with overlap checks
- Content calendar
- AI citation tracking across 8 engines, logged manually
- Competitor tracking, 3 competitors
- 3 sites included
The playbook, written down.
Why your weekend project is invisible to ChatGPT
Three gaps every AI-built site ships with, the curl command that shows each one, and roughly twenty minutes of work to close them.
Read →llms.txt, explained for humans
A plain-text map of your best pages for AI crawlers. What belongs in it, what does not, and the honest answer on whether it changes anything yet.
Read →Crawled, indexed, cited, where AI traffic begins
Three gates, and passing the first two says nothing about the third. What decides whether an answer engine names you as the source.
Read →The questions people actually ask.
The free scan
How does the free scan work?
Why only 10 pages?
Why do you want my email for the findings?
Can I rescan immediately?
Scoring
What does unmeasured mean?
Why is my score lower here than elsewhere?
What is the difference between SEO checks and GEO checks?
Do you use AI to judge my content?
Fixes and content
What are the two review points?
I am on Squarespace / Webflow / Wix. How do fixes arrive without code?
Can a fix break my site?
Does Crawld write my content?
What does build-verified mean?
Does Reddit Radar post for me?
Does Crawld publish articles to my site?
Will it work on my Lovable, Bolt or Webflow site?
Which integrations work today?
Data and the crawler
What do you do with my data?
How do I recognise your crawler?
Someone is monitoring my site with this. How do I stop it?
Find out what's actually wrong.
Takes about a minute. No account, no card.