Crawld for agencies and consultants
Audit to finished fix list as a repeatable retainer deliverable rather than a bespoke project each time.
One of the three audiences this was designed for. The others are on the solutions index.
The situation
The work is the same shape for every client and gets rebuilt from scratch every time. The audit is easy to produce; the hours go into turning it into changes somebody actually ships.
Which findings dominate here
The product is the same product for every segment: one rubric, 129 checks, the same three outcomes. What changes is which findings do the damage.
The unmeasured state
The single most useful thing for client reporting. You stop having to present a gap as a pass, and coverage gives you a defensible answer to "did you check everything?"
Severity × pages affected
A ranked list you can turn into a scope of work, rather than 400 rows the client has to triage.
Competitor monitoring
Weekly change reports on up to three competitor sites per brand: the recurring input a retainer needs.
What the loop looks like
Scan on intake to set a baseline, work the ranked plan, re-measure at the end of each cycle. The re-measurement is what makes a renewal conversation evidential rather than anecdotal.
Where this is a poor fit
White-label reporting is on the agency tier; multi-site management is real, and the scan API is live for automating client audits. The connected delivery modes that would push fixes into a client site are still in progress (CMS connectors next). Today the deliverable is the audit, the plan, and the written-out fixes.