Crawld for content brands
Enough pages that cannibalization and crawl waste are real costs, and no in-house SEO engineer.
One of the three audiences this was designed for. The others are on the solutions index.
The situation
You publish steadily and the library has grown past the point where anyone holds it in their head. Individual posts look fine. The corpus is where the problem lives, and nothing in your CMS can see the corpus.
Which findings dominate here
The product is the same product for every segment: one rubric, 129 checks, the same three outcomes. What changes is which findings do the damage.
Cannibalization
Several posts targeting one intent, splitting the signal so none of them ranks. Fourteen checks cover this, and it is invisible per-article by construction.
Crawl waste
Budget spent on pagination, faceted URLs and pages that should never have been indexed, instead of on the pages you care about.
Coverage gaps
What you claim to be about versus what you have actually written: computed across the whole crawled site rather than page by page.
What the loop looks like
Scan the library, get the overlap map, consolidate or differentiate the pages that compete, then re-measure to confirm the consolidation moved the right one up rather than killing both.
Where this is a poor fit
Below roughly fifty pages there is not enough surface area for corpus-level analysis to tell you much you could not work out by hand in an afternoon.